New Study Reveals UGC's Hidden Limits: FGC Drives Real Brand Engagement in 2025
By Rebecca Finley • December 28, 2025 • 8 min read • 24 views
Shaking Up the UGC Mythos
Imagine pouring resources into encouraging customers to post about your brand on Instagram, only to find those efforts don't directly spark the likes, shares, and comments you crave. That's the bombshell from a new study out of the Goa Institute of Management (GIM), released just yesterday. It claims user-generated content—or UGC—doesn't directly boost brand engagement on social media. Instead, it's the polished posts from your own team that light the fire.
In a field obsessed with authenticity, this finding forces marketers to pause and reassess.
Why does this matter right now? With social platforms like TikTok and Instagram flooded with user posts, brands have leaned hard into UGC campaigns. Think contests, hashtags, and reposts galore. Yet, as we wrap up 2025, this research highlights a gap between hype and reality. It draws on real consumer data across Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube, using frameworks like the Elaboration Likelihood Model to unpack how people process content. The result? A clearer path for smarter spending.
Unpacking the Study: What UGC Really Does (and Doesn't)
At its core, the GIM study compared two content types: UGC, those raw, fan-made shares, and firm-generated content (FGC), the professional stuff from your marketing department. Researchers Saswat Barpanda and Nandakumar Mekoth crunched primary data from actual users, testing how content quality and source credibility play out.
Key takeaway: UGC quality has zero direct effect on engagement. You know, those metrics like comments, shares, and time spent that keep social teams up at night. But here's the twist—both UGC and FGC indirectly influence engagement by first beefing up customer-based brand equity. That's the mental shortcut consumers use to value your brand, built on trust and identity.
FGC, though, pulls ahead with direct punch. Its credibility—think sleek videos or expert explainers—ramps up engagement right away. As Barpanda puts it, "High-quality brand-created content builds trust, identity, resulting in brand engagement. Professional, credible content still wins the consumer's mind and heart, even in the era of user-generated content."
No hard numbers from the study itself, but it validates why brands see uneven results from UGC pushes.
This challenges the flood of stats praising UGC. For instance, posts with UGC often snag 28% more engagement than pure brand content.
Or consider that 92% of consumers trust UGC over traditional ads, influencing 79% of purchase decisions.
Yet the GIM work suggests these wins are mediated—UGC builds equity slowly, but doesn't ignite immediate interaction without that foundation.
The Mediation Magic: How Brand Equity Bridges the Gap
Picture this: A customer's scroll hits your UGC repost. It feels real, sparks a subtle nod of recognition, strengthening their overall view of your brand. But to comment or share? They need deeper buy-in first. The study shows brand equity fully mediates this path, meaning content shapes perceptions before actions follow.
Using Social Identity Theory, the researchers explain why. When users identify with a brand, they process content more deeply, leading to meaningful engagement. UGC might plant the seed, but FGC waters it with credibility. Mekoth notes, "Brands can draft communication strategies that prioritize high-quality firm-generated content that connects emotionally with end-users."
For marketers, this means UGC isn't dead—it's just not the solo hero.
Why FGC Takes the Crown in 2025's Content Wars
So, if UGC falters directly, why bet big on FGC? Start with trust. In an era of deepfakes and ad fatigue, professional content cuts through. The study highlights how FGC's source credibility—your brand as the expert—drives equity and, in turn, engagement. Think tutorials that solve real problems or behind-the-scenes peeks that humanize without the amateur edge.
Contrast that with UGC's pitfalls. Sure, it's authentic, but quality varies wildly. A blurry phone pic might dilute your image, even if heartfelt. And while 93% of marketers swear UGC outperforms traditional fare,
the GIM findings remind us: Outperforms doesn't always mean directly converts to buzz.
| Content Type | Direct Engagement Impact | Indirect via Brand Equity | Credibility Boost |
|---|---|---|---|
| UGC | None | Yes | Low |
| FGC | High | Yes | High |
This table simplifies it: FGC wins on immediacy and reliability. In 2025, with AI tools making pro content easier to produce, ignoring FGC feels like leaving money on the table.
But don't ditch UGC entirely. It shines in building long-term equity, especially on visual platforms. The key? Balance. Use UGC to foster community, then amplify with FGC to convert interest into action.
Lessons from Brands Blending UGC and FGC
Real brands prove this hybrid works. Take Starbucks' #RedCupContest. Users designed holiday cups via AR in the app, sharing on Instagram and TikTok. Starbucks reposted winners with polished FGC overlays, turning user creativity into store-ready products. The result? Massive participation and emotional ties, without relying solely on raw UGC.
Glossier nailed it too. Customers submitted skincare stories with photos; the brand crafted mini-docs from them, blending user authenticity with pro production on YouTube and Instagram. This mix boosted credibility and reach, showing how FGC elevates UGC's potential.
GoPro's #GoProHeroChallenge invited extreme sports clips, then curated them into epic FGC montages. Users felt seen, engagement soared—proving mediation in action. Nike's #JustDoItChallenge does similar: Athlete-led FGC sparks user posts, which Nike polishes for broader impact.
These cases show cause and effect: UGC seeds equity, FGC harvests engagement. In 2025, with social commerce booming, this blend could mean 6.9x the interactions from UGC when paired right.
Strategies to Maximize Engagement in Your Campaigns
Ready to pivot? Here are actionable steps:
- •Prioritize FGC Quality: Invest in visuals—tutorials, explainers—that scream expertise. Aim for emotional hooks to build identity fast.
- •Curate UGC Smartly: Repost user content only after adding FGC polish, like captions or edits, to boost credibility.
- •Measure the Mediated Path: Track brand equity metrics (sentiment, recall) alongside engagement. Tools like Hootsuite can help.
- •Test Across Platforms: The study spanned Facebook, Instagram, YouTube—replicate that. UGC might equity-build on TikTok, but FGC engages on LinkedIn.
What if you ignore this? Campaigns flop into echo chambers, wasting ad dollars on unengaged scrolls.
As 2025 ends, watch how platforms evolve. With AI aiding FGC creation, the gap widens. Brands that master this balance won't just engage—they'll loyalize. Start auditing your feed: How much FGC anchors your UGC sea? The data says it's time to tip the scales.
Tagged with:
About Rebecca Finley
Social media content strategist with 7 years dissecting UGC and FGC effects on digital loyalty. Rebecca advises brands on hybrid strategies to drive authentic, measurable engagement.